Legal Opinion

Donoghue v. Smith

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 15, 1931PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

The plaintiff suffered injuries resulting from a collision-between an automobile in which she was riding and one owned by the defendant Smith and operated by the defendant Farrington. The verdict of the jury awarded her damages in the sum of $9000 and the defendants appeal from the denial of their motion to set the verdict aside as contrary to the evidence and excessive, and also assign error in the rulings on evidence and the charge of the court.

The rulings complained of were, with one exception, those which overruled the defendants’ objection to testimony offered by the plaintiff. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sterling v. Union Carbide Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Amos v. Delaware River Ferry Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Jackiewicz v. United Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  4. Deisen v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chase v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  2. Frangos v. EdmundsOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Lawrence v. NelsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Lusas v. St. Patrick's Roman Catholic Church Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  5. Procaccini v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospital, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API