Legal Opinion

BRATIC v. Rubendall

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 2012No. 2413 EDA 2009PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

MUNDY, J.:

Appellants, Alexander Bratic and Joseph Proko, appeal from the order entered July 9, 2009 granting Appellees’ petition to transfer the case to Dauphin County on the grounds of forum non conveniens pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1006(d)(1). We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

The pertinent factual and procedural background, as gleaned from the certified record, follows. On February 23, 2009, in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Appellants filed a complaint against Appellees, Charles W. Rubendall, II, Esq. (Rubendall), Keefer, Wood, Allen & Rahal, LLP (the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cheeseman v. Lethal Exterminator, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Zappala v. Brandolini Property Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Hoose v. Jefferson Home Health Care, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Walls v. Phoenix InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Borger v. MurphySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bratic, A. v. Rubendall, C., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Gardner, F. v. Consolidated Rail CorporationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Fessler v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Stoner v. Penn Kleen, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. BRATIC v. RubendallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API