Americredit Financial Services, Inc. v. Nichols
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MERRITT, Circuit Judge.
The instant appeal raises a problem that arises frequently in bankruptcy proceedings. The question before us is whether the Court should permit the modification of a Chapter 13 plan after confirmation pursuant to § 1329 of the Bankruptcy Code, or instead allow the secured creditor to repossess its security, a 1995 Ford truck, because under the modified plan the value of the security will fall faster than the creditor receives payments. In resolving this dispute, we look to the procedure outlined in our Court’s previous case of Memphis Bank & Trust Co. v. Whitman, 692…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re: Dwight Nichols and Peggy Nichols, Debtors. Americredit Financial Services, Inc., Creditor-Appellant v. Dwight Nichols and Peggy Nichols, Debtors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006