Legal Opinion

Crawford v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 2007No. 01-CF-269PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Senior Judge:

After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of second-degree murder while armed and various weapons offenses.1 On appeal he contends that his rights under Miranda2 and the Fifth and Sixth Amendments were violated, that his statement to the police was erroneously admitted into evidence in violation of the Mallory-McNabb rule,3 and that certain conduct by the prosecutor prejudiced his case and requires reversal. We find all of appellant’s arguments without merit and affirm the judgment.

I

At about 4:30 a.m. on July 9, 1999, Michael Day was talking with another man known as…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Gilliam v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Darnell Hawkins & Marvin Verter, Jr. v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Crawford v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API