Legal Opinion

State v. Varnell

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 22, 1989No. 89-0566PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.

Clark E. Varnell appeals the denial of his postconviction relief motion which challenged the trial judge's sentencing procedure. Finding no error in the judge's having formulated a tentative sentence prior to formal sentencing, we affirm.

Varnell is not a stranger to this court. In 1985, Var-nell pled guilty to one count of delivery of a controlled substance, repeater; one count of possession of a firearm by a felon, repeater; and two counts of aiding and abetting the delivery of a controlled substance, repeater. His sentence, the maximum allowed, totaled forty-one years in prison and $55,000…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Robert L. PinkneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  3. CONTEMPT IN STATE v. DewerthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Cunningham v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. SpearsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GreveWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  3. State v. KoopmansCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  4. State of West Virginia v. Scotty Joseph ByersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. GreveWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API