Baum v. Holton

Plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs below. The defendant Price did not appear to the suit. The' defendant Holton de*407murred to the complaint on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was sustained, and final judgment given against the plaintiffs, who bring the case here for review.

While we cannot commend the complaint as a model oE pleading, we think it contains enough to require the defendant Holton to answer. No cause of action is stated against Price, but he made default, and the objection of misjoinder of parties defendant was not…