Legal Opinion

Griswold v. First National Bank

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 26, 1948PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Upon this appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court sustaining a decree of the Probate Court for the district of Meriden, the primary question for determination is whether the $77,254.82 balance of the estate of the testator should, under the provisions of his will and codicil, be divided into two equal trust funds for the benefit of the plaintiff and the defendant Harold H. Griswold, respectively, as provided in the decree, or whether it should be divided into a trust fund of $50,000 for the former and one of $27,254.82 for the latter, as contended by the plaintiff.

The testator, Dr.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. ReevesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  2. St. Leger's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1867
  3. Livingston's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  4. Jackson v. AlsopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  5. Vivian's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Conway v. EmenySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  2. Connecticut Junior Republic v. Sharon HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Morehouse v. Bridgeport-City Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  4. McFarland v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.Connecticut Superior Court · 1973
  5. Mott v. Teagle Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API