Gray v. Hall
California Supreme Court
1Dissent
SHENK, J., Dissenting.
I dissent. I am in accord generally with the views expressed by Mr. Justice Preston in his dissenting opinion. I entertain no doubt, however, that the attitude assumed by the respondent herein is in the nature of a collateral attack upon the judgment in the original action of Gray v. Yarbrough. (Howe v. Southrey, 144 Cal. 767 [78 Pac. 259]; Hamblin v. Superior Court, 195 Cal. 364 [43 A. L. R. 1509, 233 Pac. 337].) When such an attack is made an inspection of the judgment-roll alone must disclose whether the judgment is void for want of jurisdiction of the court to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Forbes v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- In Re Estate of PuseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Clark v. Superior Court of Lassen CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Hamblin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- In Re Estate of DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.