Wright v. City of Cedar Falls
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
SCHULTZ, Justice.
The question presented on this appeal is whether postconviction relief under Iowa Code chapter 663A 1 is available to persons convicted of violating municipal ordinances. Appellant Robert Lee Wright, Jr. was convicted in magistrate court of violating a Cedar Falls city ordinance. He thereafter applied for postconviction relief in the magistrate court but was denied relief on grounds that chapter 663A was not available to persons convicted of violating city ordinances. The district associate court affirmed this denial. We also affirm for the reasons stated below.
Initially, we…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Janson v. FultonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- Osborne v. EdisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Sechler v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Richards v. Iowa Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. CeronSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- In Re the Marriage of BaculisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- Matter of KasterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- In re Property Seized from RasterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1998