Legal Opinion

American Preservers' Co. v. Norris

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri

Decided September 1, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Ill Equity. On motion for injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The material facts on which the decision of the present motion depends are substantially as follows:

The Taylor Manufacturing Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of Missouri, and for several years has been engaged in *712■manufacturing and selling flavoring extracts, baking-powders, shelf-go.ods, and grocers’ sundries, and until about the 15th of June, 1888, ■was also engaged in manufacturing preserves, jellies, fruit-butters\ etc. The other defendants, that is to say, L. E. Taylor, James N. and E. R. Norris, are its principal stockholders, and for some years have been officers…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pulllman's Palace Car Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Moore & Handley Hardware Co. v. Towers Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  3. Beal v. ChaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Electric Ry. Co. v. Jamaica & B. R.District Court, E.D. New York · 1894
  2. First Nat. Bank v. TownerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  3. Union Tel. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941
  4. Union Telephone Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API