Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Kennedy

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 30, 1957No. 2030PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Acting Judge.

In this action for the value of materials and services defendant offered no evidence but stood on a motion to dismiss. The motion was based on the ground that plaintiff had failed to diligently prosecute the action. The trial judge denied the motion “on the ground of excusable delay on the part of Plaintiff” and also on the ground that defendant had been equally dilatory in failing to take a default on his counterclaim against plaintiff.1 Judgment was entered on the merits for plaintiff and defendant appeals.

The record reveals that defendant had earlier filed a written…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Slater v. CannonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Reynolds v. KormanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Goldstein v. BehrendDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sinai v. Polinger Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Sinai v. Polinger Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API