Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Korman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 1953No. 1308PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Chief Judge.

Some eighty-five tenants who lived in defendant’s apartment buildings filed petitions with the Office of the Rent Administrator seeking adjustments in rent and service. 1 The petitions alleged: That the permissible rent was, due to peculiar circumstances, substantially higher than rent generally prevailing for comparable housing accommodations; that the services supplied were less than the services which should have been supplied under the minimum-service standards; and that the applicable rent ceilings permitted the receipt of unduly high rents. The petitions specifically…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Johnston Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. California Motor Transport Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Goldstein v. KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. In Re BushDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. J. Armolt v. The Hon. Judge Edward E. GuidoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API