Legal Opinion
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 21, 1992No. 73136, w/73137PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALMA WILSON, Justice:
After the Bell System was dissolved by consent decree and the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia entered a “modified final judgment” 1 the local Bell operating companies retained all intra-LATA 800 Service traffic and AT & T retained all interLATA traffic. 2 Bell was obligated to provide 800 Access Service to all carriers on the same basis as it had provided to AT & T. Under the 800 Access Service plan, a carrier may offer 800 Service under either of two options. If the carrier enters into a joint service arrangement with the local exchange company, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Cartwright v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Turpen v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Central Oklahoma Freight Lines, Inc. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cox Oklahoma Telecom, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. Norris Sucker RodsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- Cox Oklahoma Telecom, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Telecor Communications, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Telecor Communications, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002