Legal Opinion

James H. Fetzer, Ph.D v. Rumble, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided July 9, 2026No. 3:25-cv-00674Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JAMES H. FETZER, PH.D, Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. 25-cv-674-wmc RUMBLE, INC., Defendant. Plaintiff James H. Fetzer, Ph.D, who represents himself, has filed a motion for leave to file an amended complaint and an amended “Statement of Claim.” (Dkt. #7; Dkt. #8; Dkt. #9.) According to his proposed second amended complaint, plaintiff alleges that defendant Rumble, Inc., has violated state law by failing to prohibit harmful videos targeting him on “the Rumble platform.” (Dkt. #9.) Consistent with W.D. Wis.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API