Legal Opinion

Simmons v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 29, 2009No. PD-0791-08PublishedCited by 193 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · HerveyHervey, J.

Article 38.14, Tex.Code Crim. Proc., provides that a defendant cannot be convicted of an offense upon the testimony of an accomplice without other corroborating evidence “tending to connect” the defendant to the offense. In this case, the court of appeals, with one justice dissenting, reversed appellant’s aggravated-robbery conviction and acquitted him after deciding that the non-accomplice evidence did not tend to connect appellant to the offense. 1 We decide that a rational juror could have found that the non-accomplice evidence did tend to connect appellant to the offense.

Appellant,…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Malone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  3. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Holladay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Andrews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by193 opinions

  1. State v. K.E.W.Texas Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Casanova, Matthew JohnCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  3. Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
  4. LACAZE v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  5. Jason Alexander Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014

188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API