Legal Opinion

The West Point

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided February 17, 1947No. 7023, 7024PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, District Judge.

These cases involve libels filed by Charles C. Tinsley and John H. Alexander, who at the time of the occurrences herein cited were officers of the United States Navy. The facts and the questions involved in both cases are so closely related that they may be considered together in connection with the issues before the Court at this time.

It appears from the proceedings that on the afternoon of October 9, 1944, the libellants were on board the Motor Boat No. 160S0, owned by the United States, for the purpose of being transported from the Norfolk Navy Yard, Portsmouth,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Workman v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. The Western MaidSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Ex parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Ex Parte State of New York, No. 2Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Fry v. County of AlbemarleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1890

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. EarlyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
  2. United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  3. Roth v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  4. Moore v. Hampton Roads Sanitation District CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  5. Murray v. RogersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API