Legal Opinion

Philip W.L. Lum v. Raymond Jensen, Robert Drake, and the State of California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 31, 1989No. 87-2896PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHOY, Circuit Judge:

Raymond Jensen and Robert Drake (collectively referred to as “defendants”), employees of the California Department of Justice, appeal from the district court’s denial of their claim to qualified immunity in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit brought by Philip Lum. The district court denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, in part ruling that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants had violated a clearly established constitutional right. We have jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal under Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 530, 105 S.Ct. 2806,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Schweiker v. ChilickySupreme Court of the United States · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Sheldon Portman v. County of Santa Clara Bob DiridonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. W. Channing Nicholas, M.D. v. Pennsylvania State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. Dennis Hamilton v. Roger v. EndellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. David N. OSOLINSKI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lt. KANE, Et Al., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Pinder v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API