Legal Opinion
Connley v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 5, 1931No. 6124PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORCROSS, District Judge.
Appellants, Peter Connley and Herman F. Quirin, together with Nick Bruno and Joe Ver da, were made defendants in an indictment charging offenses in six counts, briefly stated in substance as follows:
1. A conspiracy to unlawfully manufacture, possess, and transport intoxicating liquor.
2. The unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor.
3. The unlawful possession of a still not registered with the collector of internal revenue.
4. The unlawful carrying on of the business of distillers without having given bond and with intent to defraud the United States of revenue.
5. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. MahoneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Glover v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Adler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1910
- United States v. LecatoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Sonnenberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. MarzanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- McCloud v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- United States v. StaybackCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Goldstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Pueblo v. Bartolomei BartolomeiSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.