McDaniel v. Franklin Railway Supply Co.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor:
The defendant’s application for approval of a supersedeas bond is predicated on the assumption that the bond when approved will serve to stay all further proceedings pending the appeal. The complainants; being informed of the application, appeared and were heard in reference thereto. They raised three contentions. These are: (a) That an appeal does not as a matter of right operate to stay the operation of an interlocutory decree for an accounting, the question of a stay in such case being one that lies within the discretion of the Chancellor; (b) that the facts of this case are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hart v. Mayor of AlbanyNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Tatem v. GilpinCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1816
- Green v. WinterNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
- Bradwell v. WeeksNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
- Messonier v. KaumanNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Powers v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1945
- Blaustein v. Standard Oil Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1945