Legal Opinion

William A. Kubrick v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 27, 1978No. 77-2388PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

Because of the unusual factors associated with the discovery of harm caused by medical malpractice, federal courts have adopted a flexible interpretation of the limitation period for filing a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act. In this case, the plaintiff contended at an early date in administrative-proceedings that a drug prescribed by a Veterans Administration physician had destroyed his hearing. However, it was not until some years later that he learned it was negligent to administer the drug as was done in his treatment. The district court,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Brooks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Stanley Bialowas, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  4. Lee Quinton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  5. Jules J. Exnicious v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Mildred Jerves v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Keene Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. Ohler v. Tacoma General HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1979

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API