Legal Opinion

First Hungarian Benefit v. Liquor Cont., Unpublished Decision (12-13-2005)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 2005No. 05AP-625UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Appellant, First Hungarian Benefit of Barberton ("appellant"), appeals from the March 17, 2005 judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, in which that court dismissed appellant's administrative appeal. For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand.

{¶ 2} Following a hearing before appellee, Ohio Liquor Control Commission ("appellee"), that agency ordered that appellant's liquor permit be suspended for five days and that appellant pay a fine. Appellant appealed to the court of common pleas pursuant to R.C. Chapter 119. On August 13, 2004, the trial court issued a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tokles & Son, Inc. v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Pembaur v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Quonset Hut, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. DeHart v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Jones v. HartranftOhio Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sisk Associates v. Comm. to Elect Grendell, 07ap-1002 (5-15-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Guardian Alarm Co. v. PortentosoOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API