Legal Opinion

Thirty Mazel, LLC v. City of East Orange

New Jersey Tax Court

Decided January 16, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeALMEIDA, J.T.C.

These matters require the court to reconcile the Appellate Division’s opinion in Alfred Conhagen, Inc. v. Borough of South Plainfield, 16 N.J.Tax 470 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 151 N.J. 74, 697 A.2d 546 (1997), with its recent decision in H.J. Bailey Co. v. Township of Neptune, 399 N.J.Super. 381, 944 A.2d 706 (App.Div. 2008). Both opinions concern N.J.S.A. 54:4-34, commonly known as Chapter 91 by virtue of its adoption as L. 1979, c. 91, and the application of that statute’s sanction limiting a taxpayer’s right to appeal a tax assessment for failure to respond to a tax…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Township of EdisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. Ocean Pines, Ltd. v. Borough of Point PleasantSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  3. Terrace View Gardens v. Township of DoverNew Jersey Tax Court · 1982
  4. Terrace View Gardens v. Township of DoverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  5. State v. EllisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. James-Dale Enterprises, Inc. v. Township of Berkeley HeightsNew Jersey Tax Court · 2011
  2. Town of Phillipsburg v. ME Realty, LLCNew Jersey Tax Court · 2011
  3. Yeshivat v. Borough of ParamusNew Jersey Tax Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API