Legal Opinion

Donnelly v. Linden Capital Partners III LP

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided May 26, 2022No. 2:20-cv-03719Unknown

1Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION ) C/A No.: 2:20-cv-3719-RMG ) Patrick K. Donnelly, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER AND OPINION v. ) ) Linden Capital Partners III, L.P., ) Linden Capital Partners IV L.P., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to strike Plaintiff Patrick Donnelly’s Rule 30(e) errata of Plaintiff’s deposition testimony. (Dkt. No. 88). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion is granted. I. Background Plaintiff brings a breach of contract and unjust enrichment claim…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sinclair Wyoming Refining v. A & B BuildersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
  2. Greenway v. International Paper Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1992
  3. Hall v. Clifton PrecisionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Arcenio E. Garcia v. Pueblo Country ClubCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  5. Rios v. BiglerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API