Legal Opinion
Huber v. Peek-A-Boot, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 1961No. Civ. 24799PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal following the sustaining of a demurrer to his second amended complaint without leave to amend.
Plaintiff alleges four causes of action; in the first three he seeks to recover damages on the theory of fraud and misrepresentation on the part of the defendants; in the fourth he alleges a conspiracy among all the defendants to do the acts alleged in the first three.
In the fall of 1952, plaintiff was employed by Peek-A-Boot, Inc. (whose true name is Plastix Footwear Corp.), and was bonded for fidelity by Fireman’s Fund Indemnity Company. Defendant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Lee on v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Butler v. AgnewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Asher v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Schur v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- SNUG HARBOR PACKING COMPANY v. SchmidtAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Goldstein v. EnochCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- McIntosh v. McIntoshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962