Legal Opinion

Chashin v. Gluck

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided December 30, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marvel, Vice Chancellor:

The complaint herein, which was filed derivatively by alleged stockholders of A. S. Beck Shoe Corporation on June 23, 1964, seeks an accounting from individual director defendants for injuries allegedly caused such Delaware corporation as a result of transactions entered into between it and a corporation *202known as Grayson-Robinson Stores, Inc. The complaint alleges that the individual defendants, who were simultaneously directors of the defendant corporation as well as directors and in some instances officers of Grayson-Robinson, are guilty of breaches of fiduciary duty…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cantor v. SachsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1932
  2. Sands v. Lefcourt Realty CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1955
  3. Blaustein v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1946
  4. Breech v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1963
  5. Rebstock v. LutzSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nickson v. Filtrol CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1970
  2. Chashin v. GluckCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API