Legal Opinion

Feldman v. Board of Appeal of Boston

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 27, 1990No. 89-P-1050PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

When the board of appeal of Boston granted James McKernan a variance to divide his property at 57 Mount Vernon Street, West Roxbury, into two undersized lots, the plaintiffs Feldman and McCaffrey sought judicial review. A judge of the Superior Court, acting under St. 1956, c. 665, § 11, required the plaintiffs to file in court a surety bond in the amount of $10,000 3 against which Mc-Kernan might recover damages and costs should the decision of the board ultimately be upheld. The plaintiffs, claiming inability, did not file the bond and, upon motion, their action was dismissed. We decide that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Warren v. Zoning Board of Appeals of AmherstMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Damaskos v. Board of Appeal of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  3. Arrigo v. Planning Board of FranklinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  4. Raia v. Board of Appeals of North ReadingMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  5. Guiragossian v. Board of Appeals of WatertownMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tsagronis v. Board of Appeals of WarehamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  2. Tsagronis v. Board of Appeals of WarehamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  3. Sheppard v. Zoning Board of Appeal of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
  4. Adams v. BrollyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  5. Adams v. BrollyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API