Legal Opinion
Kowalski v. Anova Food, LLC
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided July 31, 2013No. Civ. No. 11-00795 HG-RLPPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT ANOVA FOOD, LLC’s MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (ECF No. 112) AND DENYING DEFENDANT CLEARSMOKE TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (ECF No. 113) AND DENYING DEFENDANT ANOVA FOOD, INC.’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (ECF No. 115) AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR AN INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)
HELEN GILLMOR, District Judge.
On January 2, 2012, Plaintiffs William R. Kowalski and Hawaii International Seafood, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) filed a four-count First Amended Complaint asserting claims for (Count 1) patent infringement in violation of 35…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Beverly Hills Fan Company v. Royal Sovereign Corp. And Ultec Enterprises Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Brayton Purcell LLP v. Recordon & RecordonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Falco v. Nissan North America Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- CSAA Affinity Insurance Company v. Amerigas Propane LPDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- Dorotik v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
- Escobar v. European Aeronautic Defence and Space CompanyDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
- Reed v. ParamoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021