Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Andrus

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 28, 1901No. 30PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

BRADFORD, District Judge.

John E. Andrus, the defendant in error, brought an action of assumpsit in the court below against Thomas Bradley, the plaintiff in error, on a check dated February *19718, 1897, drawn by Bradley on the Security Trust: Company of I'liila-; delphia to the order of Francis O. Grable for $12,500 and by Giable and Andrus indorsed in blank. The defendant having pleaded non assumpsit, payment and set-off, and given notice of special matter of defense, the case went to trial before a jury. At the close of thé testimony the counsel for the respective parties stipulated-in open court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Andrus v. BradleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1900

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Palmer v. NoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Foellmi v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Hillers v. Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Woods-Taylor & Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Baker v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API