United States v. Donald Maclaren
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DIAZ, Circuit Judge:. Donald Maclaren, who is civilly committed pursuant to the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, 18 U.S.C. § 4248, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a discharge hearing. Because we conclude that the district court applied an incorrect standard for determining whether someone confined pursuant to the Adam Walsh Act is entitled to a discharge- hearing, we vacate the court’s judgment and remand so that it can apply the correct standard in the first instance.
I
A
In December 2009, the government certified Maclaren as a sexually dangerous…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
- SD3, LLC v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Walter WoodenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. James VandivereCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
- Liverpool v. Caesars Baltimore Management Company, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- United States v. WhiteDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2018