Legal Opinion

United States v. Donald Maclaren

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 2, 2017No. 16-6291PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIAZ, Circuit Judge:. Donald Maclaren, who is civilly committed pursuant to the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, 18 U.S.C. § 4248, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a discharge hearing. Because we conclude that the district court applied an incorrect standard for determining whether someone confined pursuant to the Adam Walsh Act is entitled to a discharge- hearing, we vacate the court’s judgment and remand so that it can apply the correct standard in the first instance.

I

A

In December 2009, the government certified Maclaren as a sexually dangerous…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. SD3, LLC v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Walter WoodenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. James VandivereCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
  3. Liverpool v. Caesars Baltimore Management Company, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
  4. United States v. WhiteDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API