Legal Opinion

In re Kagan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 11, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice law by this court in 1980.

Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, moves to strike respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b), on the ground that respondent was convicted in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey on January 15, 1992, upon his plea of guilty to the Federal felony of engaging in racketeering activities (predicated upon his admission to the offense of securities fraud) in violation of 18 USC § 1962 (c).

Because we conclude that respondent has been convicted of a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re SchultzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. In re SchultzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re BurksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re EriksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. In re GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. In re KaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Matter of FerrieroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API