Legal Opinion

In re Kagan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 24, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

By prior decision and order (Matter of Kagan, 184 AD2d 912) respondent was suspended from the practice of law pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (f) on account of his conviction of a serious crime (see, Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [d]) pending entry of a final disciplinary order pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (g). Respondent was convicted in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey on January 15, 1992, upon his plea of guilty to *1014the Federal felony of engaging in racketeering activities (predicated upon his admission to the offense of securities fraud) in violation of 18…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re KaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. In re SchultzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re PottsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API