Legal Opinion

Davis v. Metro North Commuter Railroad

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 21, 2022No. 1:21-cv-00387Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RHULAND DAVIS, Plaintiff, — against — OPINION & ORDER METRO NORTH COMMUTER 21 Civ. 387 (ER) (BCM) RAILROAD, ANDREW PAUL, and JOHN LONGOBARDI, Defendants. RAMOS, D.J.: Rhuland Davis brought this action pro se against Metro-North Commuter Railroad and Metro-North employees Andrew Paul and John Longobardi on January 11, 2021. Doc. 1. Davis filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”) on September 29, 2021. Doc. 22. Davis alleges that he was subjected to racial discrimination, wrongful termination, and retaliation in violation of federal and…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API