Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Attractograph Co. v. Dietrich

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 20, 1911No. Gen. No. 16,914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Petition for mandamus. Heard in this court at the October term, 1910.

1Opinion of the Court

Me. Pbesiding Justice Beown

delivered the opinion of the court.

This canse is a proceeding in which the writ of mandamus is prayed from this (court against a judge of the County Court of Schuyler county, who,' under the Municipal Court Act, had presided at a branch of the Municipal Court of Chicago at the request of the judges thereof. The writ was prayed in aid of the jurisdiction of this court in a writ of error from this court to said Municipal Court, which is upon the docket of this (court as No. 16569, and is entitled the Moore-Bond Company, defendant in error, v. The Attractograph…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Hubbard v. AnthonyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People ex rel. Cunningham v. ThistlewoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Whitney v. CadySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  4. Gunning v. SheahanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898
  5. Hawkins v. HardingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Board of Education of Paris Union School District No. 95 v. Board of Education of Non-High School District No. 158Appellate Court of Illinois · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API