Anderson v. Hardoman

Phipps, Judge.

Pro se, Jesse G. Anderson, Jr. appeals the dismissals of two complaints he filed pro se in superior court. Because the dismissals were not authorized, we reverse them and remand these cases with direction.

As the basis for dismissal, the order in each case merely provided: “the plaintiff has not complied with the provisions of [Uniform Superior Court Rule] 36.10.” This rule provides in full:

Complaints or petitions presented to the clerk for filing shall be filed only when accompanied by the proper filing fee, fee for sheriff service or a pauper’s affidavit, a civil case…