Vogel v. Hochhalter
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
Appellant Carol Vogel appeals the district court’s summary judgment determination that her exclusive remedy for a work-related injury is under Minnesota’s Workers’ Compensation Act. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Carol Vogel was employed by respondent Don Hochhalter d/b/a Viking Inn when she injured her ankle while pushing a laundry cart. At the time of the injury, Hochhalter was not covered by workers’ compensation insurance. He had previously requested and applied for a workers’ compensation policy through his insurance agent. Due to the agent’s negligence, however, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Erickson v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Brown v. L. A. Wells Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
- Smith v. Michigan State Accident FundMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Olsen v. KlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.