Legal Opinion
Seaton-SSK Engineering, Inc. v. Forbes
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided September 8, 1994No. 20A03-9308-CV-254PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STATON, Judge.
CMI-International, Inc. ("CMI") is the parent company of wholly-owned subsidiaries CMI-Permanent Mold ("Permanent Mold") and Seaton-SSK Engineering, Inc. ("Sea-ton"). CMI and Seaton were denied summary judgment in an action brought by Russell Forbes ("Forbes") seeking recovery for injuries received in the course of his employment at Permanent Mold.
The trial court certified its order pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 4(B)(6). A single issue is presented for this court's review: whether the exclusive remedy provision of IND. CODE 22-3-2-6 applies to CMI and Seaton because Forbes…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Wells v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Hendy v. LosseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Perry v. Stitzer Buick GMC, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Stump v. Commercial UnionIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Talas v. Correct Piping Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Klineman, Rose & Wolf, P.C. v. North American Laboratory Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Turner v. Richmond Power and Light Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- ProCare Rehab Services of Community Hospital v. VitatoeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- ProCare Rehab Services of Community Hospital v. VitatoeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Turner v. Richmond Power and Light Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001