Legal Opinion

State v. Fankhouser

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 31, 2006No. 32386-9-IIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 A jury convicted Anthony Fankhouser of delivering a controlled substance to a police informant. Police set up the controlled buy with Fankhouser *691after the informant claimed that Fankhouser had sold him methamphetamine one week earlier. At trial, the State violated the court’s pretrial ruling excluding evidence of the prior delivery but Fankhouser was not permitted to offer evidence directly refuting that delivery. This was error and, because it was not harmless, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

Quinn-Brintnall, C.J.

*691FACTS

¶2 Dale Lukes was arrested for unlawful possession of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. BourgeoisWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. DardenWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. DardenWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. GefellerWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. DanforthWashington Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. AguirreWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. AguirreWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. FankhouserCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of: Reuben D. MulambaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. State Of Washington v. Francisco Guijose CastroCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API