Legal Opinion

Seamans v. King

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 13, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Garnishment. Justice Courts. Constables. Bonds. Before Judge Boynton. Rockdale Superior Court. February Adjourned Term, 1887. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

This is a safe case. King was a constable. The action was upon his official bond. It involved his liability for the safe-keeping of a safe. We think him safe against the liability. The property was the subject-matter of a garnishment returnable to a justice’s court, issued at the instance of Rollins, upon a judgment against Jones, one Tilley being the garnishee. Tilley by his answer admitted his possession as bailee, also the owernership of Jones, and thereupon surrendered the property; and the court ordered it to be sold, as pointed out in the code, §§3305, 3549.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crawford v. RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
  2. Lindsey v. LindseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
  3. Board of Commissioners v. WimberlySupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  4. Holcombe v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
  5. Frost v. BordersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Felker v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Bank South, N.A. v. Roswell Jeep Eagle, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. Taylor v. BoyntonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Johns v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  5. Hearell v. VannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API