Legal Opinion
City of Chicago v. Hulbert
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided November 13, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;—■ heard in that court on appeal from the Criminal Court of Cook county; the Hon. Gwynn Garnett, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craig
The city of Chicago has in force an ordinance, two sections of which are as follows:
“Sec. 1704. The mayor may, from time to time, grant licenses to such persons as shall produce to him satisfactory evidence of their good character, to exercise or carry on the business of a pawn-broker, or of a loan-broker or keeper of a loan office; and no person shall exercise or carry on the business of a pawn-broker, loan-broker, or a keeper of a loan office, without being duly licensed, under a penalty of $100 for each day he or she shall exercise or carry on said business without such license.
“Sec. 1705.…
2Cited by4 opinions
- In Re BlalockDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1929
- Cliff v. Seligman & LatzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Swesnik Loan Co. v. CourtneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
- Modell Pawnbrokers, Inc. v. MossNew York Supreme Court · 1945