Legal Opinion

Shelist v. Boston Redevelopment Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 5, 1966PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpiegel, J.

This is a petition for assessment of damages arising out of a taking of real estate under G. L. c. 79. On or about January 8, 1962, the respondent made a pro tonto payment consisting in part of $325,000 for damages and $2,636.11 for interest computed at the rate of four per cent per annum from October 25, 1961, the date of the taking, through January 8, 1962. The payment was “accepted pro tanto except interest question reserved.” The case was tried before a jury, who, on June 9,1965, returned a verdict for the petitioner in the amount of $540,000. The petitioner filed a motion for the entry…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hanscom v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Johnson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. Brucato v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  4. Haffner v. Director of Public Safety of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  5. Building Inspector of Acton v. BD. OF APPEALS OF ACTONMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Emerson College v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. Verrochi v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Beals v. COMMISSIONER OF CORPORATIONS & TAXATIONMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. McCarthy v. Planning Board of EdgartownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. Reynolds v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API