Larzelere v. Haubert
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Error to the Court of Common Pleas No. 2, of Philadelphia county: Of July Term 1884, No. 143. Trespass, by Peter Haubert against John Larzelere, to recover damages for certain liquor seized by the sheriff as the property of Jacob Haubert, in pursuance of an attachment, under the Act of 1869, issued by Larzelere against Jacob Haubert.
Read the full summary
Error to the Court of Common Pleas No. 2, of Philadelphia county: Of July Term 1884, No. 143. Trespass, by Peter Haubert against John Larzelere, to recover damages for certain liquor seized by the sheriff as the property of Jacob Haubert, in pursuance of an attachment, under the Act of 1869, issued by Larzelere against Jacob Haubert. On the trial, before PIARE, P. J., the following facts appeared: In pursuance of an attachment issued under the Act of 1869, by John Larzelere against Jacob Haubert, the sheriff levied on certain liquor as the property of said Jacob HaubertPeter Haubert having…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trunkey
Section 9 of the Act of April 10th, 1848, P. L., 450, was enacted for the express purpose of affording relief and protection to sheriffs and other officers in case of difficulty arising in the execution of process against goods and chattels taken or entitled to be taken under such process, by reason of claims made to such goods by persons not being the parties against whom such process was issued. Upon application of the sheriff or other officer it may be lawful for the court from which the • process issued, to call before it by rule the party issuing such process and the party making such…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Siegel v. Netherlands Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Moyerman v. HaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1936