Legal Opinion · Dissent

Berry v. Javitch, Block & Rathbone, L.L.P.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 2010No. 2009-1507Published

1DissentFroelich, J.

{¶ 32} I respectfully dissent.

{¶ 33} In response to an interrogatory in a legal-malpractice action, Javitch, Block & Rathbone, L.L.P. (“the law firm”), misrepresented to Robert and Diane Berry that it had no malpractice insurance that would cover them claim. The Berrys subsequently accepted a settlement from the law firm and in exchange the Berrys were to release their claims against the law firm. Two and a half years later, the Berrys discovered the alleged misrepresentation. I would hold that the Berrys were entitled to either rescind the settlement or sue the law firm for fraud. If the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Investors REIT One v. JacobsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Haller v. Borror Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Automobile Underwriters, Inc. v. RichIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Exotics Hawaii-Kona, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Bryant v. TroutmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API