Berry v. Javitch, Block & Rathbone, L.L.P.
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentFroelich, J.
{¶ 32} I respectfully dissent.
{¶ 33} In response to an interrogatory in a legal-malpractice action, Javitch, Block & Rathbone, L.L.P. (“the law firm”), misrepresented to Robert and Diane Berry that it had no malpractice insurance that would cover them claim. The Berrys subsequently accepted a settlement from the law firm and in exchange the Berrys were to release their claims against the law firm. Two and a half years later, the Berrys discovered the alleged misrepresentation. I would hold that the Berrys were entitled to either rescind the settlement or sue the law firm for fraud. If the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Investors REIT One v. JacobsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Haller v. Borror Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Automobile Underwriters, Inc. v. RichIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
- Exotics Hawaii-Kona, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- Bryant v. TroutmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.