Legal Opinion
Bianco Homes, Inc. v. Weiler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 17, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Hempstead dated September 7, 2000, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner’s application for area variances, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.), dated March 13, 2001, which annulled the determination and directed the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Hempstead to issue the variances.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Pursuant to Village Law § 7-712-b (3) (b), in determining…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- MATTER OF SASSO v. OsgoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Pottick v. DuncanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- C & B Realty Co. v. Town Board of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. LamarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Hugel v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bianco Homes II, Inc. v. WeilerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Toussie v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Lessings, Inc. v. ScheyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Merlotto v. Town of Patterson Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007