Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Thornton & Naumes, LLP & Athari Law Office

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 11, 2007PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Crew III, J.P

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (McNamara, J.), entered July 25, 2006 in Albany County, which, inter alia, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75, denied respondents’ motion to reargue or renew two prior motions to dismiss the petition and to modify a prior order compelling arbitration.

In 2002, respondent Mohammed J. Athari and his law firm, respondent Athari Law Office, entered into a fee sharing agreement with petitioner Thornton & Naumes, LLP with regard to lead poisoning personal injury cases. In July 2005, Supreme Court granted petitioners’ application to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Sawhorse Lumber & More, Inc. v. AmellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Arbitration between Thornton & Naumes, LLP & Athari Law OfficeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API