Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Thornton & Naumes, LLP & Athari Law Office

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 28, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

Crew III, J.P.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (McNamara, J.), entered October 11, 2006 in Albany County, which, inter alia, denied respondents’ cross application pursuant to CPLR 7511 to vacate an arbitration award.

*1134The facts of this case are more fully set forth in our three prior decisions in this matter (see 36 AD3d 1119 [2007]; 36 AD3d 1057 [2007]; 35 AD3d 999 [2006]). To briefly recapitulate, in August 2002, respondent Mohammed J. Athari and respondent Athari Law Office entered into a fee sharing agreement with petitioner Thornton & Naumes, LLP with respect to lead paint and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Civil Service Employees Ass'n & StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Arbitration between Thornton & Naumes, LLP & Athari Law OfficeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. In re the Arbitration between Thornton & Naumes, LLP & Athari Law OfficeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. In re the Arbitration between Thornton & Naumes, LLP & Athari Law OfficeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API