Legal Opinion

Collins v. Stix, Kraus & Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1892PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from tbe Chancery Court of Jefferson. Heard before the Hon. Thomas Cobbs. cited' Mahan v. Smitherman, 71 Ala. 563; Semple v. Glenn, 91 Ala. 245 ; Pitts v. Poioledge, 56 Ala. 147; Rapier v. Gulf City Paper Go., 69 Ala. 476; King v. Avery, 37 Ala. 169; Bolman v. Lohman, 74 Ala. 507; Johnson v. Burner, 88 Ala. 580. cited Pitts v. Poioledge, 56 Ala. 147; Rapier v. Gulf City Co., 69 Ala. 476; Adams v. Sayre, 70 Ala. 325; Adams v. Phillips, 75 Ala. 461; Jones v. Reese, 65…

Read the full summary

Appeal from tbe Chancery Court of Jefferson. Heard before the Hon. Thomas Cobbs. cited' Mahan v. Smitherman, 71 Ala. 563; Semple v. Glenn, 91 Ala. 245 ; Pitts v. Poioledge, 56 Ala. 147; Rapier v. Gulf City Paper Go., 69 Ala. 476; King v. Avery, 37 Ala. 169; Bolman v. Lohman, 74 Ala. 507; Johnson v. Burner, 88 Ala. 580. cited Pitts v. Poioledge, 56 Ala. 147; Rapier v. Gulf City Co., 69 Ala. 476; Adams v. Sayre, 70 Ala. 325; Adams v. Phillips, 75 Ala. 461; Jones v. Reese, 65 Ala. 134; Handley v. Heflin, 84 Ala. 600; Hinds v. Hinds, 80 Ala. 225; Russell v. Garrett, 75 Ala. 350; Holt v. Wilson,…

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

The purpose of the original bill was to subject to the complainants’ demand certain real estate alleged to have been fraudulently conveyed by the debtors, John D. Collins and Julius A. Collins, to Imogene Collins. It was alleged that, on the same day the conveyance of the real estate was made, the debtors also sold and disposed of their entire stock of goods at Warrior, Alabama, to Robert Collins, who is the husband of Imogene Collins, and one *339Griffith, and “that the sale of said goods and the conveyance of said real estate were all parts of one scheme on the part of said John D. and Julius…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Semple v. GlennSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Hinds v. HindsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  3. King v. AverySupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  4. Randle v. BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  5. Bolman v. LohmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Raynes v. SharpMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Alabama Terminal & Inprovement Co. v. Hall & FarleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Tucker v. FosterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  4. Rensford v. Magnus & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  5. Wimberly v. Montgomery Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API