Legal Opinion

Howell v. Alexander

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1969No. 6826SC399PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.

The exceptions to the conclusions of law and the exception to the entry of the judgment present the questions whether the facts found support the conclusions of law and the judgment entered pursuant thereto. Schloss v. Jamison, 268 N.C. 271, 128 S.E. 2d 590.

It seems evident that the trial judge concluded that the will granted to the life tenant an unrestricted power of appointment with respect to the real and personal property in which she was given a life estate by the will, even to the extent of appointing it to herself in fee simple adversely to the interests of the remaindermen. This…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Teachey v. . GurleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Schloss v. JamisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Bowen v. DardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Cales v. DresslerIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State v. DouglasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Builders Supplies Company of Goldsboro, NC v. GaineyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Burnett v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1970
  3. Brisson v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Estate of Stanley M. Carpenter, Deceased William R. Thomas, Administrator v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  5. Keener v. KornCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API