Legal Opinion

Nalbandian v. Patrizzi

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 7, 1976PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, J.

In this case we must decide whether parties to summary process actions are entitled to speedy trial by a jury of six in accordance with G. L. c. 218, § 19B. The statute provides such privilege to any party involved in a “civil action” in any District Court in the county of Essex. We conclude that the legislative intent was to provide the privilege of such a trial in summary process actions.

The facts are as follows. Harry Nalbandian (landlord) brought suit against his tenant Alphonse Patrizzi (tenant) by writ in summary process with an account annexed, entered on March 3, 1975, in the District…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cummings v. WajdaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bank of America, N.A. v. RosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  2. Shea v. Neponset River Marine & Sportfishing, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  3. Davis Investment Corp. v. Thayer Associates, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
  4. Marrotto v. NaumannMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
  5. Fiske Capital Management Co. v. QureshiMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API