Legal Opinion

Goldenberg

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 1933No. Cause No. 15187PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirkpatrick, J.,

— All parties whose interests will be affected by the ruling of the court in this matter have withdrawn objections based upon technical considerations and have agreed that all matters involved may be disposed of by the court without further proceedings.

The fees allowed by the referee in this case are so far in excess of anything which could possibly be justified by the services rendered that the court feels obliged to call attention to the duty of referees to exercise independent judgment in the matter of fees and allowances.

Fees which appear to be excessive should not be…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re RothmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  2. In Re BarcelouxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  3. In re GoodmanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1936
  4. In re SparksDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1938
  5. In re TappDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API