Legal Opinion
Prichard Bros., Inc. v. Grady Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 9, 1988No. C3-86-1530PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
Independent School District No. 353 entered into separate contracts with the appellant Prichard Brothers, as general contractor, and the Grady Company, as architect, for the construction of a school building project. There was no direct contractual relationship between Prichard and Grady.
Ultimately, Prichard Brothers commenced suit against Grady for the latter’s alleged negligence and bad faith in performing its architectural services. Prich-ard also commenced suit against the school, alleging that it was vicariously liable for Grady’s negligence. The matter was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Superwood Corp. v. Siempelkamp Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- McCarthy Well Co. v. St. Peter Creamery, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Prichard Bros., Inc. v. Grady Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3Cited by6 opinions
- lan/stv, a Joint Venture of Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc. and Stv Incorporated v. Martin K. Eby Construction Company, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2014
- Mid-Western Electric, Inc. v. DeWild Grant Reckert & Associates Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Colbert v. BF Carvin Const. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- Prichard Bros., Inc. v. Grady Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Calabrese Foundation, Inc. v. Investment Advisors, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.